Sustainable Low-Income Housing: Examining Housing and Governance Issues in Isfahan Province

Authors

    Morad Ghasemi PhD Student, Department of Architecture, Ka.C., Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran
    Marjan Khan Mohammadi * Department of Architecture, Ka.C., Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran Khanmohammadi.marjan@kiau.ac.ir
    Siamak Panahi Department of Architecture, Ka.C., Islamic Azad University, Karaj ,iran.

Keywords:

Sustainable Housing, Low-Income Housing, Urban Governance, Housing Policy, Isfahan

Abstract

This study aimed to identify and explain the governance dimensions influencing sustainable low-income housing and to develop an expert-based governance model for housing policy and planning in Isfahan Province. A qualitative study was conducted within a pragmatic and interpretivist framework. Data were collected through 12 in-depth expert interviews and 12 expert-consensus questionnaires. Participants were selected using purposive sampling until theoretical saturation was achieved. Data were analyzed through thematic analysis, open, axial, and selective coding, followed by the Discrete Consensus Support Method. The findings revealed that governance in low-income housing is multidimensional and highly complex. Analysis generated 768 initial codes, 391 categories, and 95 major themes, which were consolidated into 12 core governance dimensions. The results indicated that weak governance knowledge, institutional fragmentation, lack of transparency and accountability, political interference, insufficient stakeholder participation, inadequate social evaluation mechanisms, and policy–implementation gaps are the primary causes of failure in low-income housing projects. Expert-consensus analysis further confirmed 75 key variables as valid components of the proposed governance framework, demonstrating an acceptable level of expert agreement and model robustness. The study demonstrates that the success of sustainable low-income housing programs depends not only on physical development but also on governance quality, institutional coordination, transparency, accountability, and meaningful stakeholder engagement. Strengthening governance structures and revising policy frameworks are therefore essential for achieving sustainable housing outcomes and improving the quality of life of low-income populations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Azizi MM. The Position of Housing Indicators in the Housing Planning Process. Fine Arts Journal. 2003(17):31-42.

2. Afshan N, Sinha RC. An Investigation of the Parameters Affecting Affordable Housing Location Choice. Engineering Proceedings. 2023;53(1):33.

3. Bakhtyar B, Zaharim A, Sopian K, Moghimi S. Housing for Poor People: A Review on Low-Cost Housing Process in Malaysia. WSEAS Transactions on Environment and Development. 2013;9(2):126-36.

4. Turner A. The Cities of the Poor: Settlement Planning in Developing Countries: Taylor & Francis; 2021.

5. Vinczeová Z, Tóth A. Urban Green Spaces and Collective Housing: Spatial Patterns and Ecosystem Services for Sustainable Residential Development. Sustainability. 2025;17(6):2538.

6. Jenkins P. Urban Management, Urban Poverty and Urban Governance: Planning and Land Management in Maputo. Environment and Urbanization. 2000;12(1):137-52.

7. Richards D, Smith MJ. Governance and Public Policy in the United Kingdom2002.

8. Nahiduzzaman KM. Housing the Urban Poor: An Integrated Governance Perspective: The Case of Dhaka, Bangladesh: KTH Royal Institute of Technology; 2012.

9. Jenkins P, Smith H, Wang YP. Planning and Housing in the Rapidly Urbanising World: Routledge; 2006.

10. Balfour DL, Smith JL. Transforming Lease-Purchase Housing Programs for Low Income Families: Towards Empowerment and Engagement. Journal of Urban Affairs. 1996.

11. Crisp R, Eadson W, While A. Tackling Poverty through Housing and Planning Policy in City Regions. 2016.

12. Kajiita RM, Kang'ethe SM. Socio-Economic Dynamics Inhibiting Inclusive Urban Economic Development: Implications for Sustainable Urban Development in South African Cities. Sustainability. 2024;16(7):2803.

13. Anaafo D, Nutsugbodo RY, Anane GK, Agyepong E, Koomson DN, editors. Temporary Structures, Permanent Challenges: Containerisation and Urban Governance in the Sunyani Municipality, Ghana. Urban Forum; 2025: Springer Netherlands.

14. Akinsulire AA, Idemudia C, Okwandu AC, Iwuanyanwu O. Strategic Planning and Investment Analysis for Affordable Housing: Enhancing Viability and Growth. Magna Scientia Advanced Research and Reviews. 2024;11(2):119-31.

15. Sharma SN, Dehalwar K. Fundamentals of Planning and Design of Housing2023.

16. Su S, Zhang J, He S, Zhang H, Hu L, Kang M. Unraveling the Impact of TOD on Housing Rental Prices and Implications on Spatial Planning: A Comparative Analysis of Five Chinese Megacities. Habitat International. 2021;107:102309.

17. Angotti T, Morse S. Zoned Out!: Race, Displacement, and City Planning in New York City: New Village Press; 2023.

18. Khalili A, Noorollahi H, Rashidi N, Rahmani M. Evaluation of Mehr Housing Policies in Iran and Proposing Solutions for Their Improvement. Urban Studies. 2014;13:20-33.

19. Behroozi Nobar P. Self-Built Settlements in Iran as an Alternative to Social Housing: Urban Poor Housing Strategies and the State's Role in the Expropriation of Informal Spaces: A Case Study of Zoorabad-Karaj: University of British Columbia; 2025.

20. Heumann L, Boldy D. Housing for the Elderly: Planning and Policy Formulation in Western Europe and North America: Routledge; 2024.

21. Oxley M. Economics, Planning and Housing. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2004.

22. McGee RJ, Warms RL. Anthropological Theory: An Introductory History: Rowman & Littlefield; 2024.

23. Bryant A. Grounded Theory and Pragmatism: The Curious Case of Anselm Strauss. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 102009.

24. Saldaña J. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Tehran: Scientific and Cultural Publishing Company; 2016.

25. Bardovi-Harlig K. Research Methods in L2 Pragmatics Research: Introduction to the Special Issue. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics. 2025:100241.

26. Sharifi M, Farhangi AA, Heidari A, Aghili V, Mirzaei Rabor F. Designing a Competency Model for Creative Industries Leaders Using Discrete Consensus Support Method and Interpretive Structural Modeling. Industrial Management. 2020;12(2):299-318.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-22

Submitted

2026-01-21

Revised

2026-05-25

Accepted

2026-06-03

How to Cite

Ghasemi, M. ., Khan Mohammadi, M., & Panahi, S. . (1405). Sustainable Low-Income Housing: Examining Housing and Governance Issues in Isfahan Province. Manifestation of Art in Architecture and Urban Engineering, 4(2), 1-28. https://www.jmaaue.org/index.php/jmaaue/article/view/209

Similar Articles

1-10 of 120

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.