Exploring the Aesthetic Components of Biophilic Architecture in the Design of Thematic Museums with an Approach to Enhancing Human–Nature Interaction (Focusing on the Motorcycle Museum Concept)
Keywords:
Biophilic Architecture, Thematic Museum, Aesthetics, Human-Nature Interaction, Motorcycle MuseumAbstract
Biophilic architecture, emphasizing the connection between humans and nature, is considered an innovative strategy in the design of urban and public spaces. This study explores the aesthetic components of biophilic architecture in the design of thematic museums and examines how human–nature interaction can be enhanced within such environments, with a particular focus on the concept of a motorcycle museum. Thematic museums, beyond merely displaying objects, provide an opportunity to create multidimensional and engaging experiences, the richness of which can be significantly enhanced through biophilic architectural principles. A review of previous studies revealed that the application of this approach in thematic museums has received relatively limited attention. Accordingly, elements such as natural lighting, vegetation, the use of water features and natural materials, and nature-inspired forms were identified as key design tools. The findings indicate that biophilic design in a motorcycle museum can not only provide visitors with a deeper engagement with the exhibited content but also improve the quality of their experience by reducing stress and promoting psychological well-being. In addition to identifying aesthetic components, this study proposes strategies for integrating the cultural identity of the museum with principles of environmental sustainability.
Downloads
References
1. Honarvar J, Rashidi S, Taheri Sarmad F. Developing Tourist Attraction Scenarios for Future Cities by Prioritizing Biophilic Architecture Components. Future Cities Vision. 2025(23):21-36.
2. Hadadi P, Habib S, Mirriahi S. Explaining a Model for Improving Environmental Psychology Indicators through Biophilic Architecture. Haft Hesar Environmental Studies. 2025(51):57-76.
3. Ghalebandi SL, Soltanzadeh H, Khoshbakht Bahramani S. Explaining Strategies for Organizing Ecotourism Accommodations within the Framework of Biophilic Architecture Using a Sustainable Ecotourism Development Approach: Study Area of Damavand. Interdisciplinary Studies in the Excellence of Architecture and Urbanism. 2025(7):211-35.
4. Mohajer F, Bitaraf S. Analyzing Biophilic Architectural Design Patterns in Hot and Humid Climates for Eco-Camp Design. Green Architecture. 2024(43):173-84.
5. Behboudzadeh F, Norouzian Maleki S, Ekhlasi A. Explaining Biophilic Environmental Design Patterns: A Systematic Review of Concepts and Approaches. Sustainable Architecture and Urbanism. 2024;12(1):41-66.
6. Mousavi SM, Heidari A, Asadi SN, Mirzaei R. Examining the Biophilic Bio-Oriented Approach toward Environmentally Compatible Design and Human Health Based on a Grounded Theory Approach. Geography and Environmental Sustainability. 2023(46):41-54.
7. Ghorbani Param MR, Mianehro MR, Darvishi M, Fallahi M, Shahhosseini R. Examining the Trend of Biophilic Urbanism Theory and Its Effects on Environmental Peace and Security in Cities. Child and Adolescent Social Harms. 2022(38):15-36.
8. Wilson EO. Biophilia: Harvard University Press; 1984.
9. Kellert SR, Calabrese EF. The Practice of Biophilic Design: Biophilic Design Press; 2015.
10. Browning WD, Ryan CO. Nature Inside: A Biophilic Design Guide: RIBA Publishing; 2020.
11. Xing Y, Williams A, Knight A. Developing a Biophilic Behavioural Change Design Framework: A Scoping Study. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 2024;94:128278.
12. Abdollahi R, Abbasi Z. Explaining the Hikmah-Based Pattern of Biophilic Architecture in Line with the Psychological Goals of Environmental Design. Quarterly Journal of Hikmah-Philosophical Foundations of Iranian Art. 2024;3(9):194-208.
13. Bozorg H, Pakzad J. The ABCs of Environmental Psychology for Designers. Tehran: Armanshahr; 2015.
14. Nasiri Hendeh-Khaleh E. Assessing the Effectiveness of Biophilic Components in Improving the Environmental Quality of the Historical Fabric of Ardabil. Geographical Studies of Mountainous Regions. 2024;5(4):79-92.
15. Garousi M, Ahmadi F, Nazarpour H. Emotionally-Oriented Design in Museums: A Case Study of the Jewish Museum Berlin. Frontiers in Psychology. 2024;15:1378201.
16. Bina M, Rahmatian K. Examining the Reduction of Energy Consumption in Earth-Sheltered Buildings in the Hot and Dry Climate of Dezful. 2024;12(1):167-84.
17. Jafarizadeh R, Abdollahzadeh Taraf A, Haghlasan M, Saghafi-Asl A. Examining Components Affecting Biophilic City Design. Geographical Research Quarterly. 2023;38(3):391-400.
18. Shahcheraghi A. Paradigms of Paradise: Rereading and Recognition of the Persian Garden. Tehran: Jihad Daneshgahi Publications; 2010.
19. Rapoport A. House Form and Culture: Prentice-Hall; 1969.
20. Pourjafar M. Reconsidering the Fundamental Concepts of Iranian Architecture: Privacy, Territory, and Centrality: Iran University of Science and Technology Press; 2011.
21. Ardalan N, Bakhtiar L. The Sense of Unity: The Role of Tradition in Iranian Architecture: Khak Publications; 2001.
22. Naghizadeh M. City and Architecture in the Hot and Dry Climate of Iran: Academic Center for Education, Culture and Research, Tehran Branch; 2008.
23. Najafi M, Tabatabaei S. A Comparative Study of Spatial Patterns of Historical Houses in Kerman and Ferdows during the Qajar Period. Honar-ha-ye Ziba: Architecture and Urbanism. 2013;18(2):15-26.
24. Altman I. The Environment and Social Behavior: Privacy, Personal Space, Territory, Crowding: Brooks/Cole; 1975.
25. Hillier B, Hanson J. The Social Logic of Space: Cambridge University Press; 1984.
26. Hillier B. Space Is the Machine: A Configurational Theory of Architecture: Cambridge University Press; 1996.
27. Pourjafar M, Khodabandelou S, Sharifzadeh A. A Comparative Study of the Concept of Privacy in Traditional and Contemporary Iranian Residential Architecture Using the Space Syntax Method. Art and Civilization of the Orient. 2013;1(2):49-58.
28. Atalar S. The Traditional Turkish House and Its Spatial Organization. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research. 2001;18(3):209-23.
29. Elsayed M. Transformation of Privacy in the Contemporary Egyptian Apartment. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment. 2018;33(3):507-27.
30. Mansouri S, Rezaei A, Karimi B. Analysis of the Effect of Geographical Location on the Continuity of Vernacular Architectural Patterns: The Case Study of Ferdows City. Human Geography Research Quarterly. 2019;51(3):729-45.
31. Giddens A. Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age: Stanford University Press; 1991.
32. Harvey D. The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change: Blackwell; 1989.
33. Musterd S, Ostendorf W. Urban Segregation and the Welfare State: Inequality and Exclusion in Western Cities: Routledge; 2013.
Downloads
Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 امیرمحمد گلپور
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
