Evaluating the Effects of Part 19 of Iran’s National Building Regulations on Architectural Envelopes for Reducing Fossil Energy Consumption: A Comparative Study of Residential Buildings in Tehran during the 2000s and 2010s

Authors

Keywords:

Part 19 of the National Building Regulations, architectural envelope, fossil energy consumption, thermal performance, climate-responsive architecture, residential buildings

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of implementing Part 19 of Iran’s National Building Regulations on the thermal performance of architectural envelopes and fossil energy consumption in residential buildings constructed in Tehran during the 2000s and 2010s. This applied study adopted a descriptive–analytical, quantitative, and comparative design. The study population comprised multistory residential buildings in Tehran, from which six buildings representing the two construction periods were selected through purposive stratified sampling. The cases were comparable in terms of residential use, climatic conditions, floor area, and number of stories. Data were collected through documentary analysis, field observations, and assessment of building-envelope thermal-performance indicators. The evaluated variables included wall and roof U-values, window-to-wall ratio, insulation type and thickness, glazing and frame type, air infiltration, heating and cooling loads, and annual energy consumption. DesignBuilder and Climate Consultant were used to model and compare each building under three scenarios: a conventional baseline, the existing envelope condition, and an optimized condition incorporating improved insulation, high-performance glazing, shading systems, and more efficient building services. Comparative simulation results indicated that existing envelope strategies reduced annual energy consumption by approximately 20% to 47% relative to the conventional baseline. Under the optimized scenarios, the estimated reduction increased to approximately 49%–61%. The Jamaran Building, characterized by a detached brick screen, extensive vegetation, and double-glazed windows, demonstrated the strongest existing performance and the greatest optimization potential. Buildings constructed more recently generally exhibited lower thermal transmittance, better-controlled window-to-wall ratios, greater use of insulation and double glazing, and higher compliance with Part 19 requirements. Nevertheless, no formal inferential statistical tests, confidence intervals, or probability values were reported; therefore, these findings represent comparative inferences derived from energy simulations rather than statistical hypothesis testing. Part 19 provides an essential regulatory basis for reducing fossil energy use in residential buildings; however, its effectiveness depends on integrated climate-responsive envelope design, rigorous construction supervision, and performance-oriented implementation beyond minimum regulatory compliance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Perez-Lombard L, Ortiz J, Pout C. A Review on Buildings Energy Consumption Information. Energy and Buildings. 2008;40(3):394-8.

2. Ghiabakloo Z. Fundamentals of Building Physics 2: Environmental Conditioning. Tehran: Academic Center for Education, Culture and Research, Amirkabir University of Technology Branch; 2015.

3. Givoni B. Climate Considerations in Building and Urban Design. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 1998.

4. Olgyay V. Design with Climate: Bioclimatic Approach to Architectural Regionalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2015.

5. Ghobadian V. Climate and Architecture. Tehran: University of Tehran Press; 2015.

6. Abdolkarimi Komleh H. Energy in the Body of Architecture. Tehran: Shaparak-e Sorkh Publications; 2018.

7. Mahdavi-Nejad M, Bemanian M, Javanroodi K. Energy and High-Performance Architecture. Tehran: Tarbiat Modares University Press; 2019.

8. Road H, Urban Development Research C. Guideline for Building Envelope Design with an Energy-Consumption Optimization Approach. Tehran: Road, Housing and Urban Development Research Center; 2017.

9. Ashrae. ASHRAE Handbook: Energy Efficiency in Buildings. Atlanta, GA: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers; 2020.

10. Habibi SM, Bahrami M. Evaluating the Effects of National Building Regulations on Reducing Energy Consumption in Residential Buildings in Tehran. Hoviat-e Shahr Quarterly. 2014;7(15):55-68.

11. Sadeghi A, Rezaei F. Analysis of Building Envelope Performance in Reducing Energy Consumption with Emphasis on Topic 19 of the National Building Regulations. Iranian Journal of Architecture and Urbanism. 2018;9(2):33-48.

12. Ghanbari M. A Comparative Study of Residential Buildings before and after the Implementation of Topic 19 in Tehran. Journal of Sustainable Architecture Research. 2019;4(1):21-36.

13. Sharifi, Ghobadian. Examining the Effect of Physical Characteristics of Building Envelopes on Time Lag and Heat-Transfer Decrement Factor: A Case Study of High-Rise Buildings in Hamedan. Environmental Science and Technology. 2017;19(Special issue 4):167-78.

14. Al-Sanea SA, Zedan MF, Al-Hussain SN. Effect of Building Envelope Design on Thermal Performance of Residential Buildings. Applied Energy. 2012;94:187-200.

15. Arjmandnia R, Younesi G. Energy-Saving Methods in the Architecture of Low-Energy Houses. Tehran: Danesh va Fan Publications; 2020.

16. Salehi. Examining the Quantitative Effect of Applying Thermal Comfort Index Criteria on Energy Consumption in Residential Buildings in Ilam. Environmental Science and Technology. 2021;23(10):193-206.

17. Ghanbaran. Examining the Thermal Behavior of Double-Skin Facades in the Climate of Tehran. Sustainable Architecture and Urbanism. 2014;1(2):43-53.

18. Seraj. The Effect of the Number of Inner and Outer Layer Skins of Double-Skin Facades on Energy Consumption in Office and Educational Buildings: A Case Study of the Basic Sciences Faculty Building at Iran University of Science and Technology. Environmental Science and Technology. 2014;16(3):181-90.

19. Hadianpour. Assessing the Capacity for Using Double-Skin Envelopes in Architectural Design for Iran's Hot and Dry Climate to Reduce Energy Consumption: The Case of Yazd. Honar-ha-ye Ziba: Architecture and Urbanism. 2014;19(3):29-38.

20. Vosough A. A Comparative Study of Heating and Cooling Loads of a Building with a Lamella Facade and a Glass Double-Skin Facade in a Dry Climatic Region [Master's thesis, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Department of Thermal and Fluids Engineering]: University of Kashan; 2018.

21. Ghiyasvand J, Abadi Pazouki R. The Interaction of Architecture and Renewable Energies. Tehran: Faranama Publications; 2022.

Downloads

Publication Timeline

Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted

Issue

Section

مقالات

How to Cite

Afshari, F. ., Yousefi Tazakor, M. ., Janipour, B. ., & Javan Forouzande, A. . (1405). Evaluating the Effects of Part 19 of Iran’s National Building Regulations on Architectural Envelopes for Reducing Fossil Energy Consumption: A Comparative Study of Residential Buildings in Tehran during the 2000s and 2010s. Manifestation of Art in Architecture and Urban Engineering, 1-25. https://www.jmaaue.org/index.php/jmaaue/article/view/243

Similar Articles

1-10 of 148

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.