از تعارض اولویت‌های ذی‌نفعان تا انتخاب پایدار: تدوین چارچوب سناریومحور تصمیم‌گیری چندمعیاره برای طراحی نمای مراکز تجاری تهران

1. Aksamija A. Sustainable Facades: Design Methods for High-Performance Building Envelopes: John Wiley & Sons; 2013.

2. Boettger T. Threshold Spaces: Transitions in Architecture—Analysis and Design Tools: Birkhäuser; 2014.

3. Kousidi S. Space-Containing Façades: Mediating Environmental, Social, and Urban Dynamics in Collective Housing Design. Architecture. 2025;5(1):12.

4. Alborzi P, Soltanzadeh H, Hosseini SB. Examining the Contribution of Form and Façade of Buildings to the Branding of Commercial Complexes: A Case Study of Commercial Complexes in Tehran. Bagh-e Nazar. 2022;19(101):45-64.

5. Khomeiri F, Pazhouhanfar M, Stoltz J. The Impact of Architectural Facade Attributes on Shopping Center Choice: A Discrete Choice Modeling Approach. Buildings. 2025;15(17):3161.

6. Azimi B, Hashempour P, Beyti H. Formation of Taste in Society for Choosing Architectural Façade and Its Relation with Consumer Market. MANZAR, The Scientific Journal of Landscape. 2024;16(74):45-60.

7. Lynch K. The Image of the City: MIT Press; 1960.

8. Nasar JL. Urban Design Aesthetics: The Evaluative Qualities of Building Exteriors. Environment and Behavior. 1994;26(3):377-401.

9. Ilbeigi M, KohneRoudPosht AM, Ghomeishi M. Cognitive Differences in Residential Facades from the Aesthetic Perspectives of Architects and Non-Architects: A Case Study of Iran. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2019;51:101760.

10. Mortazavi MS, Mehdizadeh Saradj F, Faizi M. Perceptual Dimensions Effective in the Aesthetics of Façade Styles: Comparison of Architects and Non-Architects. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment. 2024;39(2):122-40.

11. Srijon NA, Islam MZ. A Comprehensive Study of Architects' and Non-Architects' Perceptions of Building Facades Through the Lens of Environmental Perception Theory. MAJ – Malaysia Architectural Journal. 2025;7(1):115-32.

12. He F, He Y, Sun L. Gender Differences in Color Perceptions and Preferences of Urban Façades Based on a Virtual Comparison. Building and Environment. 2023;244:110835.

13. Yousefi M, Varmaghani H. Assessing the Semantic Quality of Commercial Complexes Facades Based on Reading Mental Perceptions of Audience (Women) Familiar and Unfamiliar with the Environment. Urban Economics and Planning. 2022;4(2):55-72.

14. Prieto A, Oldenhave M. What Makes a Façade Beautiful? Architects' Perspectives on the Main Aspects That Inform Aesthetic Preferences in Façade Design. Journal of Façade Design and Engineering. 2021;9(1):1-16.

15. Mahdavinejad M, Bazazzadeh H, Mehrvarz F. The Impact of Façade Geometry on Visual Comfort and Energy Consumption in an Office Building in Different Climates. Energy Reports. 2024;10:2267-85.

16. Bazazzadeh H, Świt-Jankowska B, Fazeli N, Nadolny A. Shading Device as an Important Part of Daylightophil Architecture; A Designerly Framework of High-Performance Architecture for an Office Building in Tehran. Energies. 2021;14(24):8272.

17. Ibrahim A, Freewan A. An Evaluation Study of Shading Devices and Their Impact on the Aesthetic Perception vs. Their Energy Efficiency. Journal of Facade Design and Engineering. 2023;11(3):283-98.

18. Valitabar M, GhaffarianHoseini A. Advanced Control Strategy to Maximize View and Control Discomforting Glare: A Complex Adaptive Façade. Architectural Engineering and Design Management. 2022;18(5):371-89.

19. Pastore L, Andersen M. The Influence of Façade and Space Design on Building Occupants' Indoor Experience. Journal of Building Engineering. 2022;53:104497.

20. Hashemi Kashani SM, Pazhouhanfar M. Role of Physical Attributes of Preferred Building Facades on Perceived Visual Complexity: A Discrete Choice Experiment. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 2024;26:12547-69.

21. Kawshalya LWG, Weerasinghe UGD. The Impact of Visual Complexity on Perceived Safety and Comfort of Users: A Study on Urban Streetscapes of Sri Lanka. PLOS ONE. 2022;17(8):e0272074.

22. Ghozatlou F, Sharghi A. Exploring Façade Structural Information: Harnessing the Power of Parametric Analysis—Case Study: 16th Street (Shahid Farshi Moghaddam), Tehran. International Journal of Architectural Computing. 2025;23(1):112-29.

23. Hosseini SM, Showkatbakhsh M. An Integrated Generative–Analytic Framework for the Performance-Driven Design of Kinetic Façades. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment. 2025;14(2):85-101.

24. Nazari A, Torabi MR. Identification and Prioritization of Quality Indicators for Building Façade Design Using a Fuzzy Approach. Journal of Iranian Architecture & Urbanism. 2022;13(2):45-60.

25. Zekri A, Tarkashvand A, Ekhlassi A. An Integrated Rational–Intuitive Knowledge-Based Decision-Making Model for Façade Aesthetics Using SMART Method. Architectural Engineering and Design Management. 2025.

26. Forman E, Gass SI. The Analytic Hierarchy Process—An Exposition. Operations Research. 2001;49(4):469-86.

27. McFadden D. Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior. In: Zarembka P, editor. Frontiers in Econometrics: Academic Press; 1974. p. 105-42.

28. Stamps AE. Use of Static and Dynamic Media to Simulate Environmental Experience. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 2010;110(3):896-904.

29. Shahabi Maskoun N, Nikpour M. Analysis of the Aesthetic and Environmental Sustainability Aspects of Commercial Façade Design on User Perception and Preferences: Case Study of Tehran. Bagh-e Nazar. 2025;22(99):51-68.