ارزیابی و تحلیل شاخص‌های عملکردی شهر هوشمند با رویکرد توسعه پایدار در شهر کرمان
کلمات کلیدی:
شهر هوشمند, توسعه پایدار شهری, نظریه داده‌بنیاد, شاخص‌های عملکردی, شهر کرمانچکیده
هدف پژوهش حاضر، تدوین و اعتبارسنجی تجربی چارچوبی زمینه‌محور از شاخص‌های عملکردی شهر هوشمند با تأکید بر توسعه پایدار در شهر کرمان بود. این پژوهش کاربردی با طرح آمیخته اکتشافی متوالی در دو مرحله انجام شد. در مرحله کیفی، با استفاده از نظریه داده‌بنیاد و مصاحبه با خبرگان حوزه‌های شهرسازی، مدیریت شهری و شهر هوشمند، داده‌ها بر اساس رویکرد استراوس و کوربین و طی کدگذاری باز، محوری و انتخابی تحلیل شدند که در نهایت به استخراج 10 مقوله اصلی و 58 مقوله فرعی انجامید. سپس 58 شاخص استخراج‌شده به گویه‌های پرسشنامه تبدیل شدند. در مرحله کمی، داده‌های پرسشنامه با استفاده از نرم‌افزار SmartPLS و مدل‌سازی معادلات ساختاری مبتنی بر حداقل مربعات جزئی (PLS-SEM) تحلیل و مدل اندازه‌گیری و ساختاری با ضرایب مسیر و بوت‌استرپ ارزیابی شدند. نتایج استنباطی نشان داد همه روابط ساختاری آزمون‌شده معنادار بودند. زیرساخت فناوری هوشمند (β = 0.400, t = 6.825, p < 0.001) و پیاده‌سازی فناوری اطلاعات (β = 0.204, t = 3.463, p = 0.001) بر ظرفیت تدوین راهبردها اثر مثبت داشتند. اجتماع هوشمند (β = 0.279, t = 4.224, p < 0.001)، حکمرانی هوشمند (β = 0.226, t = 3.241, p = 0.001)، سازه‌های هوشمند (β = 0.171, t = 2.549, p = 0.011) و حمل‌ونقل پایدار (β = 0.301, t = 4.570, p < 0.001) عملکرد شهر هوشمند را به‌طور مثبت پیش‌بینی کردند. عملکرد شهر هوشمند نیز بر تدوین راهبردها اثر معناداری داشت (β = 0.339, t = 5.223, p < 0.001). قوی‌ترین روابط مربوط به اثر تدوین راهبردها بر توسعه پایدار شهری (β = 0.809, t = 29.194, p < 0.001) و حفاظت از محیط‌زیست (β = 0.808, t = 35.352, p < 0.001) بود و مدل حدود 73 درصد از واریانس پیامدهای شهر هوشمند را تبیین کرد. یافته‌ها نشان می‌دهد تحقق شهر هوشمند پایدار در کرمان صرفاً به توسعه فناوری وابسته نیست، بلکه مستلزم یکپارچگی ظرفیت‌های فناورانه، اجتماعی، حکمرانی، کالبدی و حمل‌ونقلی در قالب راهبردهای منسجم شهری است. نقش بسیار قوی ظرفیت راهبردی در توسعه پایدار و حفاظت محیط‌زیست نشان می‌دهد که تبدیل قابلیت‌های هوشمند به پیامدهای پایدار، بیش از هر چیز به تدوین و اجرای اثربخش راهبردهای شهری وابسته است.
دانلودها
مراجع
1. Hwang M, Verhulsdonck G. Quantifying the sustainability impacts of smart cities and AI: A meta-analysis. Sustainable Cities and Society: Advances. 2026;2(1):100027.
2. Almeida F, Guimarães CM, Amorim V. Exploring the differences and similarities between smart cities and sustainable cities through an integrative review. Sustainability. 2024;16(20):8890.
3. Blasi S, Ganzaroli A, De Noni I. Smartening sustainable development in cities: Strengthening the theoretical linkage between smart cities and SDGs. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2022;80:103793.
4. Tomadon LdS, do Couto EV, de Vries WT. Smart city and sustainability indicators: A bibliometric literature review. Discover Sustainability. 2024;5(1):28.
5. Karal FS, Soyer A. A systematic literature review: Setting a basis for smart and sustainable city performance measurement. Sustainable Development. 2024;32:555-73.
6. AbuRayash A, Dincer I. Development of integrated sustainability performance indicators for better management of smart cities. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2021;67:102704.
7. Esteban-Narro R, Lo-Iacono-Ferreira VG, Torregrosa-López JI. Evaluating smart and sustainable city projects: An integrated framework of impact and performance indicators. Smart Cities. 2025;8(5):172.
8. Huovila A. Evaluation of smart and sustainable city development: What indicators to use, why and when? Sustainable Cities and Society. 2024;102:104012.
9. Mills DE, Pudney S, Correa Gomes R, Sarturi G. Smart city capacities: Extant knowledge and future research for sustainable practical applications. Sustainability. 2024;16(9):3719.
10. Mora L, Gerli P, Ardito L, Messeni Petruzzelli A. Smart city governance from an innovation management perspective: Theoretical framing, review of current practices, and future research agenda. Technovation. 2023;123:102717.
11. Wang M, Bastos T. Does smart city implementation improve the subjective quality of life? Evidence from China. Technology in Society. 2022;72:102161.
12. Zhao Z, Zhang Y. Impact of smart city planning on economic and social benefits. Complexity. 2020;2020:8879132.
13. Dashkevych O, Portnov BA. Does city smartness improve urban environment and reduce income disparity? Evidence from an empirical analysis of major cities worldwide. 2023.
14. Chen CW. Can smart cities bring happiness to promote sustainable development? Contexts and clues of subjective well-being and urban livability. Developments in the Built Environment. 2023;13:100108.
15. Pira M. A novel taxonomy of smart sustainable city indicators. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. 2021;8:197.
16. Elassy M, Al-Hattab M, Takruri M, Badawi S. Intelligent transportation systems for sustainable smart cities. Transportation Engineering. 2024:100252.
17. Sharifi A, Allam Z, Bibri SE, Khavarian-Garmsir AR. Smart cities and sustainable development goals (SDGs): A systematic literature review of co-benefits and trade-offs. Cities. 2024;146:104659.
18. Qian X, Liu Y, Zhang H, Li J. An assessment framework of global smart cities for sustainable development. Cities. 2024;145:104567.
19. Anand PB. Assessing smart city projects and their implications for public policy in the Global South. Contemporary Social Science. 2021;16:199-212.
20. Akande A, Cabral P, Gomes P, Casteleyn S. The Lisbon ranking for smart sustainable cities in Europe. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2019;44:475-87.
21. Shao J, Min B. Sustainable development strategies for smart cities: Review and development framework. Cities. 2025;158:105663.
22. Izadfar N, Rezaei MR. Identifying key factors influencing sustainable urban regeneration through futures studies: Inefficient urban fabric in Yazd. Geography and Urban Spatial Planning. 2020;10(34):109-30.
23. Roberts P, Sykes H, Granger R. Urban regeneration: SAGE; 2017.
24. Couch C, Sykes O, Börstinghaus W. Thirty years of urban regeneration in Britain, Germany and France: The importance of context and path dependency. Progress in Planning. 2011;75(1):1-52.
25. Purahmad A, Habibi K, Keshavarz M. The conceptual evolution of urban regeneration as a new approach to deteriorated urban fabrics. Iranian-Islamic Studies. 2010;1(1):73-93.
26. United N. World Urbanization Prospects: The 2018 Revision. United Nations; 2019.
27. Sharifi A. Urban climate resilience: A review of concepts, frameworks, and strategies. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2024.
28. Izadi A, Nasekhian S, Mohammadi M. Explaining a conceptual framework for sustainable regeneration of historic urban fabrics: A review of documents, declarations and regeneration charters. Parseh Archaeological Studies. 2018(6):161-77.
29. Ricci L, Mariano C, Marino M. Cities in emergency: Practices of sustainable urban regeneration in Spain and the United Kingdom. Sustainability. 2024;16(15):6462.
30. Khan Mohammadi M, Qalenui M. Culture-led regeneration through creative industries and cultural neighborhoods in historic urban fabrics. Restoration and Architecture of Iran. 2016;6(12):67-84.
31. Meerow S, Newell JP, Stults M. Defining urban resilience: A review. Landscape and Urban Planning. 2016;147:38-49.
32. Partow P. Climate-responsive urban planning and architectural strategies for improving public spaces in Bandar Abbas. 33rd National Conference on Urban Planning, Architecture, Civil Engineering and Environment2026. p. https://civilica.com/doc/2713981.
33. Shao J, Yao W, Luo L, Zeng L, He Z, Guo H. A sustainable development perspective on urban-scale roof greening priorities and benefits. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2024;108:105489.
34. Sheikh Alishahi S, Kiani M. A climate-responsive framework for using local materials to improve climate resilience and reduce embodied carbon in smart cities. 5th International Conference on Seismic Retrofitting2026. p. https://civilica.com/doc/2723093.
35. Khalili R, Hosseinzadeh Dalir K, Purmohammadi MR. Revitalizing historic urban fabrics through urban tourism: Tabriz. Geography of Tourism Space. 2020;9(34):97-114.
36. Kibert CJ. Sustainable construction: Green building design and delivery: Wiley; 2016.
37. Sarlak M. Architectural regeneration of deteriorated urban fabrics through sustainable development. 2026. p. https://civilica.com/doc/2683174.
38. Jafari GH. Regenerating deteriorated urban fabrics through sustainable architecture. 14th International Conference on Modern Studies in Civil Engineering, Architecture, Urban Planning and Environment in the 21st Century2025. p. https://civilica.com/doc/2541048.
39. Eshraghi P, Talami R, Nikkhah Dehnavi A, Mirdamadi M, Zomorodian ZS. Adopting explainable-AI to investigate the impact of urban morphology design on energy and environmental performance in dry-arid climates. Energy and Buildings. 2024.
40. Khosravi MJ, Estelaji A, Piri S, Sabbaghi HR. Analyzing and assessing resilience in deteriorated urban fabric: District 7 of Tehran. 2022. p. https://civilica.com/doc/1552995.
41. Kukabi L, Barmayehvar B. Sustainable cities and communities: Indicators for resilient cities (International Standard ISO 37123): Qazvin University Jihad Publications; 2020.
42. Shafiei Dastjerdi M, Lak A, Ghaffari A. Developing an urban form evaluation model based on spatial resilience. Urban Planning Geography Research. 2021;10(2):1-27.
43. Atashkhiz M. An integrated neighborhood regeneration model based on urban resilience and citizen participation in municipalities. 29th National Conference on Urban Planning, Architecture, Civil Engineering and Environment2025. p. https://civilica.com/doc/2437759.
44. Fattahizadeh F, Yazdani S, Sheikh al-Eslami A, Etemad G. Sustainable urban regeneration in historic fabrics through an integrated approach: Darvazeh Rey neighborhood and the bazaar area of Qom. Geographical Research. 2021;36(4):437-46.
45. Kalantari Khalilabad H, Elmi SM. Developing urban regeneration strategies based on physical resilience in the deteriorated urban fabric of District 1, Qazvin. 3rd National Conference on Innovation in Architectural Engineering and Urban Planning2020. p. https://civilica.com/doc/1181839.
46. Hasanpur SS. Developing strategies for sustainable regeneration of deteriorated urban fabric based on its components and criteria: Mohammadabad neighborhood, Mashhad. Space and Place Studies. 2025(12):47-62.
47. Sedaqati A, Asubar K, Talebkhah H. Analyzing the capacities and limitations of informal settlements in Bojnurd through sustainable urban regeneration: Baqerkhan 1, Baqerkhan 2 and Persi Gaz neighborhoods. Sustainable Urban Development. 2025(19):81-102.
48. Qanbari E, Mahdavi A, Afzali K. Developing a conceptual framework for urban regeneration: A review study of Qeshm. Geography (Regional Planning). 2023;13(4):737-46.
49. Tubchi Sani A, Masud M, Rabbani A, Sarrami Forushani G. Scenario-based planning and its application to sustainable urban regeneration: The deteriorated urban fabric of Dargahan, Qeshm Island. Sustainable Urban Development. 2022(7):40-59.
50. Obeyat M, Maleki S, Obeyat M, Obeyat M. Assessing the effects of land-use changes on spatiotemporal patterns of land surface temperature and heat islands in Ahvaz using satellite imagery. Human Geography Research. 2023;55(2):39-61.
51. Yazdanifard F, Adibi Saadinejad F, Arbabi Sabzevari A, Judaki HR. Futures studies of resilience components in deteriorated urban fabric: Central Ahvaz. Iranian Futures Studies. 2025;10(1).
52. Gudarzi M, Soltani Z, Alibakhshi A. Assessing the effects of access to urban facilities and services on place attachment in deteriorated urban fabrics of Ahvaz metropolis. Geographical Studies of Coastal Regions. 2023;4(3):89-103.
53. Bahadori B. Examining changes and physical development in Ahvaz metropolis with emphasis on social, urban and environmental indicators. 2019. p. https://civilica.com/doc/1547371.
دانلودها
گاه‌شمار انتشار
- ارسال
- بازنگری
- پذیرش
شماره
نوع مقاله
مجوز
حق نشر 2025 Mahdiyeh Zeinali Kermani (Author); Kourosh Afzali; Hooshmand Alizadeh (Author)
این پروژه تحت مجوز بین المللی Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 می باشد.
