Comparative Study of the Concept of Aesthetics in Sustainable Architecture and Visual Arts with Emphasis on Environmental Aesthetics Theory (Case Study: Mellat Cineplex Gallery Campus)
Keywords:
Karl Groos, Rudolf Arnheim , Visual Arts , Sustainable Architecture , Environmental AestheticsAbstract
The understanding of beauty in architecture and the visual arts has, in recent centuries, moved away from formalist approaches and shifted toward an experiential, contextual, and environmental perspective. Within this shift, environmental aesthetics theory has emerged as an interdisciplinary framework that enables the simultaneous analysis of visual, sensory, cultural, and ecological elements in the perception of beauty. This article aims to examine the intersection between the principles of environmental aesthetics and sustainable design through a comparative analysis of sustainable architecture and contemporary visual arts, with emphasis on the case study of Mellat Cineplex Gallery Campus. The primary objective of the study is to elucidate how the principles of environmental aesthetics are reflected in three levels—visual structure, meaning, and environmental experience—within sustainable architecture. The article also demonstrates how integrating the viewpoints of Rudolf Arnheim (structural perception) and Karl Groos (contextual aesthetics) can provide a theoretical foundation for designing sustainable spaces with cultural identity. The research employs a qualitative and analytical method with a comparative approach, utilizing the case study of the Mellat Campus architectural project to examine the alignment between theoretical propositions and their concrete manifestation. The findings indicate that sustainable architecture is achieved when the perceptual experience of the audience, the formal structure of the space, and its connection with cultural and environmental context are designed in an integrated manner. In the Mellat Campus, the unity among form, function, sensory experience, and interaction with the urban and natural fabric realizes a concrete embodiment of environmental aesthetics theory.
Downloads
References
1. Carroll N. The Philosophy of Art: A Contemporary Introduction. Tehran: Iranian Academy of the Arts; 2013.
2. Ott B, McIver Lopes D. Encyclopedia of Aesthetics. Tehran: Matn; 2014.
3. Collinson D. Aesthetic Experience. Tehran: Iranian Academy of the Arts; 2009.
4. Dewey J. Art as Experience. Tehran: Qoqnoos; 2012.
5. Dufrenne M. The Phenomenology of Aesthetic Experience. Tehran: Varā; 2017.
6. Gaut B. A Dictionary of Aesthetics. Tehran: Māhī; 2016.
7. Ja'farīhā R. Aesthetics of Urban Landscape, Emphasizing the Views of Islamic Thinkers. Qazvin: Academic Center for Education, Culture and Research (Jahad-e Daneshgahi); 2017.
8. Levinson J. The General Problems of Aesthetics. Tehran: Matn; 2011.
9. Levinson J. Aesthetics of the Arts. Tehran: Iranian Academy of the Arts; 2013.
10. Ness JL. The Evaluative Mental Image of the City. Tehran: Ārmānshahr; 2014.
11. Winters E. Aesthetics and Architecture. Aesthetics and Architecture. Tehran: Naqsh-e Jahān; 2017.
12. Arnheim R. The Forces of Visual Perception in Architecture. Tehran: SAMT; 2013.
13. Arnheim R. Art and Visual Perception. Tehran: SAMT; 2013.
Downloads
Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mohammad Piry Ardakani; Abbas Moataghedi (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.