Analytical Review of the Visual and Spatial Character of Urban Neighborhoods Toward Optimal Spatial Planning (Case Study: Sirus Neighborhood in District 12 of Tehran Municipality)
Keywords:
Landscape and landscape, spatial planning, desirability, Tehran, Sirous neighborhoodAbstract
The rapid expansion of cities without adherence to design regulations is one of the major causes of disorder in contemporary urban environments. In Iranian metropolises, cities have lost the opportunity for spatial refinement due to rapid growth, resulting in evident visual chaos. Neglecting urban visual character, landscape, and the quality of urban spaces is considered one of the serious issues facing the city of Tehran. Due to insufficient attention to the principles of urban visual character and landscape and their role in spatial planning, many proposed plans have failed to meet citizens’ needs. The Sirus neighborhood, one of the historical cores of Tehran, is among the sites whose historical fabric makes it worthy of examination. The aim of this study is to analyze the factors affecting the visual and spatial character of the Sirus neighborhood in line with achieving optimal spatial planning. The central area of the Sirus neighborhood was selected as the study boundary for redesigning its visual character and landscape toward efficient spatial planning. This research is applied in purpose and employs a qualitative–quantitative methodology. The statistical population consists of experts. The sampling technique was snowball sampling. Research data were collected through a library method, and the data collection instrument was a questionnaire. Data were analyzed using a Delphi panel approach. The results indicate that the visual and spatial character of the Sirus neighborhood, with an emphasis on spatial planning, is unfavorable, with most criteria scoring below the mean value of 3. Overall, among the 35 evaluated criteria, 22 were in an unfavorable condition and 13 were in a favorable condition.
Downloads
References
1. Berelyānī H. Investigating Effective Factors on the Improvement of Urban Face and Landscape with Emphasis on Pedestrian Paths in Mashhad City: Ferdowsi University of Mashhad; 2013.
2. Ḥātamī Nezhād H, Dāvarī Nezhād M, Alīzādeh AH. An Analysis of the Role of Urban Face and Landscape and its Impact on Citizens' Behavioral Patterns in Rāhnamā'ī Street, Mashhad. Scientific-Specialized Journal of Geographers. 2021;1(1):20-33.
3. Dāneshpūr AH. A Guide to Street Design as an Urban Space with Emphasis on Face and Landscape - Case Study: Southern Lālehzār Street Area, Tehran: Iran University of Science and Technology; 2020.
4. Ghā'ed Raḥmatī S, Khādem al-Ḥoseinī A, Banārī S. Strategic Spatial Planning of the City and the Operational Plan of Ardakan Municipality, Fars. Planning and Spatial Planning (Humanities Group). 2021;25(2):145-81.
5. Kidd s. Planning Theory & Practice (Towards a Framework of Integration in Spatial Planning: An Exploration from a Health Perspective). planning Theory & Practice. 2007;8(2):161-80.
6. Ito K, Kang Y, Zhang Y, Zhang F, Biljecki F. Understanding urban perception with visual data: A systematic review. Cities Journal. 2024;152(1):1-10.
7. Gao M, Hu C. Landscape Design Utilizing Visual Communication Technologies. International Journal of Information System Modeling and Design. 2025;16(1):1-25.
8. Zhang M, Shen T, Huo L, Liao S, Shen W, Li Y. Study on Mechanism of Visual Comfort Perception in Urban 3D Landscape. Buildings Journal. 2025;15(4):625-8.
9. Hong X, Li S, Xinah T, Sing X. Spatial performance evaluation and optimization of integrated aboveground and underground spaces in urban commercial complexes. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering. 2025;14(2):623-49.
10. Āgāh I. Evaluation of the Impact of Education on Urban Face and Landscape. New Research Approaches in Management and Accounting Quarterly. 2024;8(95):2-21.
11. Hedayatzadeh F, Kamani S, Heydari R. Utilizing Geographic Information System (GIS) and Analytic Network Process (ANP) in Assessing the Ecological Potential of Malayer County for Urban Development Management and Identifying Development-Friendly Areas. Transactions on Data Analysis in Social Science. 2021;3(4):218-34.
12. Ṣādeghī S, Panāhī A, Valīzādeh R. Factors Influencing the Transformation of the Spatial-Physical Structure of Metropolises (Case Study: Tabriz Metropolis). Geography Journal. 2023;21(77):71-87.
13. Pākzād J, Torābī M, Turkzādeh N, Ḥoseiniyūn S, Fārūqas MR, Ghārābīgī A, et al. Urban Space Design Guide: Ārmānshahr Publications; 2023.
14. Ghaẓanfarpūr H, Mughānī Raḥīmī B, Bolūj Emdādī F. A Comparative Analysis of Access to Public Spaces and the Function of Urban Face with a Sustainable Development Approach (Case Study: Districts 1 and 2 of Kerman City). 2016:101-24.
15. Manzo L. "For Better or Worse: Exploring Multiple Dimensions of Place Meaning.". Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2005;25(1):67-86.
Downloads
Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 سید علی نوری; فرید علی یار (نویسنده)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.