Explaining the Role of Placemaking Components in Enhancing Social Interactions on the Main Streets of Sanandaj
Keywords:
Manifestation of Art, Urban Identity, Social Interaction, Place-makingAbstract
This study aims to design and validate a comprehensive model for identifying the determinants of placemaking with emphasis on enhancing social interactions in the urban spaces of Sanandaj. This applied research employed a quantitative descriptive–analytical approach. The statistical population consisted of Sanandaj residents, from whom 271 participants were selected using Cochran’s formula and stratified random sampling. Data were collected using a researcher-developed questionnaire comprising 30 items across 10 constructs. Instrument validity was confirmed by experts and reliability achieved a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.89. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS and LISREL through structural equation modeling. Structural equation modeling revealed that physical quality, safety, accessibility, local identity and culture, socio-economic functions, natural environment, spatial justice, and urban management exert significant positive effects on placemaking. Placemaking also demonstrated a strong direct and significant effect on social interactions. Model fit indices (RMSEA=0.047, CFI=0.94, χ²/df=1.98) confirmed excellent model adequacy. Placemaking constitutes a core mechanism for strengthening social interactions and improving urban quality of life in Sanandaj, requiring an integrated approach to urban design and governance.
Downloads
References
1. Karimi-Yazdi M, Heidarzadeh M, Saleh-Ali S. Urban public spaces as an interactive-participatory platform: An analysis of theoretical and empirical foundations. Journal of Fine Arts: Architecture and Urban Planning. 2019;24(3):89-102.
2. World B. Public spaces for all: How inclusive public spaces can foster social cohesion: World Bank Publications; 2021.
3. Peters K, Elands B, Buijs A. Social interactions in urban parks: Stimulating social cohesion? Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 2010;9(2):93-100.
4. Relph E. Place and placelessness: Pion; 2020.
5. Ramli M, Norouzi H, Ahmadi R. Placemaking in urban spaces: An integrated approach toward achieving sustainable development goals. Manifestation of Architecture and Urbanism Art. 2020;8(1):2-15.
6. Carmona M. Principles for public space design, planning to do better. Urban Design International. 2019;24(1):47-65.
7. Gehl J. Life between buildings: Using public space: Island Press; 2011.
8. Gehl J. Cities for people: Island Press; 2021.
9. Mehta V. The street: A quintessential social public space. Routledge; 2020.
10. Albrecht J. The "fourth places": Contemporary public spaces for informal social interaction among strangers. Journal of Urban Design. 2016;21(1):124-42.
11. Lewicka M. Place attachment: How far have we come in the last 40 years? Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2021;74:101-15.
12. Scannell L, Gifford R. The experienced psychological benefits of place attachment. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2020;71:101-18.
13. Manzo LC, Perkins DD. Finding common ground: The importance of place attachment to community participation and planning. Journal of Planning Literature. 2021;36(2):1-15.
14. Heidarzadeh M, Karimi-Yazdi M, Saleh-Ali S. Urban public spaces as a platform for social interactions: An analysis of the role of place identity and citizen participation. Human Geography Research. 2025;57(2):61-80.
15. Ebrahimpour M, Rezaei A, Mohammadi F. The role of physical and perceptual-psychological components of public spaces in promoting social interactions: A case study of residential complex residents in District 22 of Tehran. Urban Studies. 2021;12(45):133-50.
16. Mohammadi F, Ebrahimpour M, Rezaei A. The role of physical and perceptual-psychological components of public spaces in promoting social interactions: A case study of residential complex residents in District 22 of Tehran. Urban Studies. 2021;12(45):133-50.
17. Kabisch N, Haase D, Haase A. Urban green space availability in European cities. Ecological Indicators. 2021;123:107-18.
18. Sileryte R, van den Bosch CCK. The role of urban green spaces in promoting social interactions: A systematic review. Landscape and Urban Planning. 2022;221:104-18.
19. Van Herzele A, Wiedemann T. A monitoring tool for the provision of accessible and attractive urban green spaces. Landscape and Urban Planning. 2020;193:118-30.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Hesam Rasoolabadi (Author); Farzin Charehjoo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
