Investigation of the Executive Method of Biofeedback and Neurofeedback in Behrouz Gharibpour's Directing

Authors

Keywords:

Biofeedback, Neurofeedback, Puppet Theater, Performer, Behrouz Gharibpour

Abstract

This research examines the innovative method of Behrouz Gharibpour in puppet performance, based on the "biofeedback" and "neurofeedback" systems, which has its roots in Stanislavski's naturalistic acting. Unlike traditional acting, where the actor directly engages with the role, in puppet opera, the performer establishes a connection with the role through a marionette. This method is designed so that the performer imparts a human identity to the puppet by transferring their inner emotions into its movements. Biofeedback and neurofeedback, which are tools for controlling physiological reactions and optimizing brain performance, play a key role in this system. Biofeedback provides vital feedback from the body and allows for greater control over bodily functions, while neurofeedback helps improve cognitive and physiological performance by training the subconscious mind. In addition to their impact on the performing arts, these methods have applications in medicine and can increase individuals' pain tolerance thresholds. The results of this research, conducted qualitatively using a descriptive-analytical method, indicate that Behrouz Gharibpour, a pioneer of puppet opera in Iran, has elevated the coordination between the performer, the puppet, and the audience to a deeper level by utilizing biofeedback and neurofeedback techniques. By emphasizing the internal connection between the performer and the puppet, he creates a natural and believable performance in which movements, emotions, and music are conveyed in a coordinated manner. In his works, the performer must perceive the puppet's movements as part of their own body and, through mental focus and bodily awareness, convey the character's emotions to the audience. This method, in addition to increasing the impact of the performance, helps create vivid and meaningful puppets that immerse the audience in the depth of the story.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Abarghooh Yf, Esfahani AS. Evaluation of Perceptual Indicators Regarding Environmental Quality of Medical Centers (Case Study: Selected Wards of One of Yazd's Private Hospitals). Quarterly Journal of Management Strategies in Health System. 2022.

2. Brambilla A, Lindahl G, Dell’Ovo M, Capolongo S. Validation of a Multiple Criteria Tool for Healthcare Facilities Quality Evaluation. Facilities. 2020;39(5/6):434-47.

3. Pujiyanti I, Yetti AE, Fitria TA. Efektifitas Penerapan Healing Environment Pada Fasilitas Kesehatan Tipe D Di Yogyakarta. Jurnal Arsitektur Dan Perencanaan (Juara). 2021;4(1):27-38.

4. Ferrante T, Villani T. Environmental Physical and Perceived Quality in Hospice. Herd Health Environments Research & Design Journal. 2021;14(4):324-38.

5. O’Hara S. Rapid Review of the Health Care Built Environment Support for Hospice/End-of-Life Patients, Families, and Interdisciplinary Care Teams. Journal of Hospice and Palliative Nursing. 2025;28(1):15-23.

6. Mangili S, Pattaro B, Brambilla A, Ferraguzzi G, Caira C, Capolongo S. The Healing Environment for Healthcare Staff in Paediatric Settings: A Cross-National Semi-Structured Survey on Healthcare Staff Satisfaction. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2025;22(9):1444.

7. Lipson‐Smith R, Pflaumer L, Elf M, Blaschke SM, Davis A, White M, et al. Built Environments for Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation Services and Care: A Systematic Literature Review. BMJ Open. 2021;11(8):e050247.

8. Zhang X. Spatial Characteristics of Community Mental Health Institutions in Urban Contexts—Using the Architectural Design of the Mallet ST Youth Mental Health Centre in Sydney, Australia as a Case Study. SHS Web of Conferences. 2024;192:01012.

9. Gawlak A, Smyl D. Social Perception of Psychiatric Treatment of Adolescents in Poland and Quality of Hospital Space From the Perspective of Potential Patients. Acta Neuropsychologica. 2024;22(2):241-59.

10. Ajiboye SA. Harmonizing Spaces: Investigating the Intersection of Sound and Architectural Design. Studies in Art and Architecture. 2024;3(3):46-56.

11. Rastogi AP, Srivastava SK. The Role of Sound in Shaping Architectural Spaces: A Multisensory Approach. International Journal of Advanced Research in Science Communication and Technology. 2024:75-91.

12. Zainazlan AFB, Jamal KAA, Hamidon NA. Lighting Methods Using Islamic Typographic Ornamentation Design Analysis in Achieving Indoor Environment Quality. 2025:147-86.

13. Martínez-Soto J, Luis Alfonso de la Fuente S, Ruíz-Correa S. Exploring the Links Between Biophilic and Restorative Qualities of Exterior and Interior Spaces in Leon, Guanajuato, Mexico. Frontiers in Psychology. 2021;12.

14. Bai X, Li X, Ding Y. The Perceived Restorativeness of Outdoor Spatial Characteristics for High School Adolescents: A Case Study From China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022;19(12):7156.

15. Mao K. Restorative Museum Environments: Emotional Coping Strategies for People Living With Chronic Multimorbidity. Frontiers in Psychiatry. 2025;16.

16. Altamimi S, Iranmanesh A, Denerel SB. Exploring the Spatial Dimensions of Social Sustainability in the Workplace Through the Lens of Interior Architects in Jordan. Buildings. 2023;13(6):1448.

17. Çoşkun O, Deemer DA, Hercules WJ, Tronstad O, Kruser JM. Characterizing the Built Environment of the Intensive Care Unit: A Focus on Spaces Used for Family Communication. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 2025;211(Supplement_1):A7788-A.

18. Navakazi V, Meka B, Beqiri FX. Assessment of Primary Health Care Facilities in Kosovo Using Space Syntax Analysis. Journal of Science Humanities and Arts - Josha. 2021;8(3).

19. Papaz D. The Impact of Navigation Strategies on Spatial Memory Formation in Virtual Architectural Spaces. Agg+. 2025;13(1):37-62.

20. Turgay ZT, Ünlü A. What Makes a Space Relatively Memorable a Study on the Recollection of Spaces Through Space Syntax and Imageability Theories. Iconarp International J of Architecture and Planning. 2025.

21. Elbatrawy S, Samra M. Enhancing Personal Identity for Interactive Interiors via Biometrics: Inpatient Rooms in Hospitals as a Case Study. Mej Mansoura Engineering Journal. 2022;47(3):41-59.

22. Elnimr H. A Study of Architectural Barriers and the Potential Role of Assistive Technologies in Long-Term Healthcare Centres for People With Alzheimer’s. Interaction Design and Architecture(s). 2022(54):111-33.

23. Norouzi N, Chen J-C, Jarrott SE, satari a. Designing Intergenerational Spaces: What to Learn From Children. Herd Health Environments Research & Design Journal. 2022;16(2):174-88.

24. Hitch L, Kodali H, Starvaggi M, Wyka K, Huang TT. A Systematic Review on the Relationship Between the Built Environment and Children’s Quality of Life. 2023.

25. Zhao Y, Berg Pvd, Ossokina IV, Arentze T. Individual Momentary Experiences of Neighborhood Public Spaces: Results of a Virtual Environment Based Stated Preference Experiment. Sustainability. 2022;14(9):4938.

26. Csomós G. Investigating the Green and Thermal Environmental Quality of Educational Institutions in an Urban Planning Context: A Debreceni Case Study. Buildings. 2026;16(4):836.

27. Xu L, Li Q, Ji X, Sun D, Meng Y, Yu Y, et al. Impact of Streetscape Built Environment Characteristics on Human Perceptions Using Street View Imagery and Deep Learning: A Case Study of Changbai Island, Shenyang. Buildings. 2025;15(9):1524.

28. Zhong Y, Guo M, Zhang M, Li T. Identifying Street Environmental Factors That Attract Public Attention From the Jogger’s Perspective: A Multiscale Spatial Exploration. Buildings. 2024;14(7):1935.

29. Masridin MH, Ismail AS. Critical Regionalism Approach for Djami Mosque Design Towards the Aesthetics of Sustainability. Journal of Islamic Architecture. 2022;7(2):220-32.

30. Kaderbieke B, Yeraliyeva M, Trofimov V, Popov Y. El Rediseño Del Palacio Del Presidente en Kazajistán. Innovaciencia Facultad De Ciencias Exactas Físicas Y Naturales. 2022;10(1).

31. Tlusty FR, Tlusty RE, Fedorovskaya NA. Basic Directions in the Formation of a Hybrid Urban Environment of Coastal Cities in the South of Primorsky Region. Iop Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering. 2021;1079(5):052040.

32. Zinchenko A. Existential Fears and Visual Perception of the Architectural Environment. Municipal Economy of Cities. 2025;4(192):113-23.

33. Gaminiesfahani H, Lozanovska M, Tucker R. A Scoping Review of the Impact on Children of the Built Environment Design Characteristics of Healing Spaces. Herd Health Environments Research & Design Journal. 2020;13(4):98-114.

34. Chrysikou E. The Ecopsychosocial Provision for Psychiatric Environments. European Journal of Public Health. 2020;30(Supplement_5).

Downloads

Published

1405-01-01

Issue

Section

مقالات

How to Cite

Gharib Pour, R., & Mohebi, P. (1405). Investigation of the Executive Method of Biofeedback and Neurofeedback in Behrouz Gharibpour’s Directing. Manifestation of Art in Architecture and Urban Engineering, 4(1), 1-12. https://www.jmaaue.org/index.php/jmaaue/article/view/170