Examining the Role of Visual Integration and Connectivity in the Spatial Organization of Public Buildings in the First Pahlavi Era Using Space Syntax (Case Studies: National Museum of Iran, Tehran Post Office, and National Bank Bazaar Branch)
Keywords:
First Pahlavi Architecture, Public Buildings, Space Syntax Analysis, Connectivity, Visual IntegrationAbstract
This study aimed to explain the role of connectivity and visual integration indices in shaping spatial organization, environmental legibility, and movement patterns in public buildings of the First Pahlavi era. This research adopted a mixed-method (qualitative–quantitative) approach based on a comparative case study strategy. Three representative public buildings from the First Pahlavi period in Tehran—the National Museum of Iran, Tehran Post Office, and the National Bank Bazaar Branch—were selected as case studies. Data collection involved architectural drawings, historical documents, and field observations. The analysis was conducted using the space syntax approach, particularly the visibility graph analysis method. Depthmap software was employed to quantify spatial configuration and extract key indices, including connectivity and visual integration, at the architectural scale. The analytical process included examining spatial distribution patterns of indices, comparing case studies, and interpreting spatial structures in relation to functional organization. The results indicated that in all three buildings, central spaces and main circulation paths exhibited the highest levels of connectivity and visual integration, functioning as primary nodes for movement distribution and user orientation. In contrast, specialized and service spaces showed progressively lower values, reflecting a hierarchical and controlled spatial structure. In the National Museum of Iran, moderate visual integration and a sequence-based organization facilitated a staged visitor experience. In the National Bank, high connectivity combined with variable visual integration enabled smooth public movement alongside visual control and operational security. In the Post Office building, high connectivity paired with low visual integration indicated a prioritization of operational efficiency and functional segregation. Overall, a significant relationship was observed between spatial configuration and movement and functional patterns. The findings demonstrate that the spatial organization of public buildings in the First Pahlavi era was governed by a modern rationality emphasizing order, efficiency, and control of movement flows. A deliberate balance between connectivity and visual integration can serve as a key design principle in contemporary architecture to enhance spatial legibility, guide movement, and improve functional performance.
Downloads
References
1. Habibi SM. From Shar to City: A Historical Analysis of the Concept of City and Its Physical Image, Thought and Influence. Tehran: University of Tehran Press; 2011.
2. Bani Masoud A. Contemporary Architecture in Iran: In Search between Tradition and Modernity. Tehran: Honar-e Memari-e Qarn Publishing; 2012.
3. Montello DR. The Contribution of Space Syntax to a Comprehensive Theory of Environmental Psychology. In: Kubat AS, editor. Space Syntax and Spatial Cognition. Istanbul: Istanbul Technical University Press; 2007. p. 23-55.
4. Pafka E, Dovey K, Aschwanden G. Limits of Space Syntax for Urban Design. Urban Design International. 2020;25:1-18.
5. Koch D. Spatial Systems as Producers of Meaning: The Idea of Knowledge in Three Public Libraries. Journal of Space Syntax. 2009;1(1):3-22.
6. Dalton RC, Holscher C, Turner A. Understanding Space: The Nascent Synthesis of Spatial Analysis and Cognitive Science. Environment and Planning B. 2015;42(1):7-10.
7. Hillier B, Hanson J. The Social Logic of Space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1984.
8. Lynch K. The Image of the City. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1960.
9. Gibson JJ. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin; 1979.
10. Turner A, Doxa M, O'Sullivan D, Penn A. From Isovists to Visibility Graphs. Environment and Planning B. 2001;28(1):103-21.
11. Hillier B. Space Is the Machine: A Configurational Theory of Architecture. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1996.
12. Cetin M, Yilmaz S, Ozturk S. Evaluating Spatial Configuration through Space Syntax Analysis. Sustainability. 2020;12(5):1-15.
13. Hillier B. Space Is the Machine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007.
14. Wineman J, Peponis J, Dalton N. Exploring Space Syntax and Spatial Cognition. Environment and Behavior. 2006;38(5):667-98.
15. Dursun P, editor Space Syntax in Architectural Design. Proceedings of the 6th International Space Syntax Symposium; 2007; Istanbul.
16. Byun N, Choi J. A Study on Spatial Configuration and Social Interaction Using Space Syntax. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering. 2016;15(2):253-60.
17. Netto VM. The Social Fabric of Cities: A Configurational Approach. London: Routledge; 2016.
18. Kim YO, Piao Y. The Application of Space Syntax in Architectural Design Analysis. Frontiers of Architectural Research. 2017;6(3):329-42.
19. Evcil AN. Wheelchair Accessibility to Public Buildings in Istanbul. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2009;31(1):76-85.
20. Ma J, Ding L, Wang H. Spatial Configuration and User Movement in Public Buildings. Automation in Construction. 2017;81:198-209.
21. Keles R, Takva H, Cakici Z. Evaluating Accessibility in Public Buildings Using Space Syntax. Journal of Urban Design. 2025;30(2):210-28.
22. Yamu C, van Nes A, editors. Fractal Urban Models and Their Potential for Sustainable Mobility: A Spatio-Syntactic Analysis. Proceedings of the 12th International Space Syntax Symposium; 2019: Beijing Jiaotong University.
23. Lamprecht M. Space Syntax as a Socio-Economic Approach: A Review of Potentials in the Polish Context. Miscellanea Geographica. 2022;26(1):5-14.
24. Daniel V, Shafei B, Saroushiani S. Nikolai Markov's Architecture: Architectural Collection of the Transformation Period in Iran. Tehran: Did Publications; 2003.
25. Ghobadian V. Stylistics and Theoretical Foundations in Contemporary Iranian Architecture. Tehran: Elm-e Memar Institute; 2015.
26. Daniel V, Shafei B, Saroushiani S. Andre Godard's Architecture: Architectural Collection of the Transformation Period in Iran. Tehran: Victor Daniel Publications; 2015.
27. Hillier B. Can Streets Be Made Safe? Urban Design International. 2004;9(1):31-45.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Nesa Hajmoradi (Author); Gholamreza Talischi; Seyed Jalil Mousavi, Kianoosh Zakerhaghighi (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.